Biogen, Roche, Takeda, and Vertex Pharmaceuticals have exited the AAV capsid field. Meanwhile, Pfizer has completely abandoned all work in gene therapy.

This is very unfortunate for the neurodegenerative disease field, where many familial cases could, in theory, be cured with such technologies.

Many gene therapies have received regulatory approval. Most of these approaches use adeno-associated viruses (AAVs) and lentiviruses for gene delivery, in vivo and ex vivo, respectively.

The scientific foundation is solid (we understand how to design vectors and deliver genetic payloads), but industrialization faces many bottlenecks. Manufacturing costs per patient remain very high—hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Since gene therapies primarily target rare diseases, the patient populations are small. Companies cannot rely solely on scaling to lower costs. After the initial cohort is treated, the market shrinks dramatically.

While academia can demonstrate that gene therapies work on a small scale, industry needs to prove that these therapies are reliable, scalable, safe, and financially sustainable—much higher standards. This explains why many promising academic results lead to companies retreating when confronted with the challenges of large-scale production and commercialization.

Alternatives such as mRNA, antisense therapies (ASO), and protein drugs offer different balances of feasibility, durability, safety, and economic viability.

Huntington’s Disease and C9orf72 ALS: Shared Mechanisms and Therapeutic Hopes

Approximately 70,000 people have been diagnosed with Huntington’s disease (HD) in the U.S. and Europe, with hundreds of thousands more at risk of inheriting the condition. Despite the clear genetic cause of HD, there are currently no approved therapies that delay onset or slow progression.

Both Huntington's disease and C9orf72-linked ALS, while clinically distinct, share a common hallmark: long, abnormal repetitions of DNA bases. The success of antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) in spinal muscular atrophy (SMA, SMN1 gene) in 2017, followed by gene therapy in 2019, gave researchers confidence to pursue similar strategies in HD and C9orf72 ALS. Progress in treating one of these repeat expansion diseases may provide hope for others.

1. Genetic Basis

1.1 Huntington’s disease (HD)

HD is caused by an expanded CAG trinucleotide repeat in the HTT gene. - Normal alleles: up to approximately 26 repeats - Pathogenic threshold: 36 or more repeats

CAG encodes glutamine, leading to a mutant protein with an expanded polyglutamine (polyQ) tract. This toxic protein disrupts neuronal function and accumulates throughout the body, contributing not only to neurodegeneration but also to systemic issues like muscle atrophy, cardiac problems, impaired glucose tolerance, weight loss, osteoporosis, and testicular atrophy.

1.2 C9orf72 ALS/FTD

C9orf72-related ALS and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) are caused by an expanded GGGGCC (G4C2) hexanucleotide repeat in the C9orf72 gene. - Normal alleles: up to approximately 30 repeats - Pathogenic alleles: hundreds to thousands

The expansion causes disease through several mechanisms: - Reduced C9orf72 protein levels - Formation of toxic RNA foci - Production of abnormal dipeptide repeat proteins via repeat-associated non-ATG (RAN) translation

1.3 Other repeat expansion diseases

• Spinocerebellar ataxias (SCAs) – many caused by CAG expansions
• Fragile X syndrome – CGG expansion in FMR1
• Myotonic dystrophy – CTG expansion in DMPK

2. Therapeutic Approaches: Shared Strategies

2.1 Antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs)

ASOs aim to reduce toxic transcripts. - HD: ASOs targeting HTT mRNA have reached clinical trials (e.g., Roche/Ionis). - C9orf72 ALS: ASOs targeting repeat-containing transcripts are in early-stage trials.

2.2 Gene silencing/editing

The most advanced approach in HD is uniQure’s AMT-130 gene therapy: - Uses an AAV vector to deliver microRNAs designed to silence mutant HTT. - Administered through MRI-guided stereotactic neurosurgery directly into the striatum. - Clinical trials (U.S. and Europe) are ongoing, with promising early results showing up to 75% slowing in disease progression in high-dose patients over 36 months.

These approaches are not yet cures, but they show that disease modification is possible. Advances in vector design (AAVs, lipid nanoparticles) are directly transferable to other repeat expansion disorders.

2.3 Targeting RNA structures

Small molecules that bind abnormal RNA structures (hairpins, G-quadruplexes) are under development for C9orf72 ALS and myotonic dystrophy, with potential extension to CAG-repeat disorders like HD.

2.4 Modulating protein homeostasis

Strategies to boost autophagy, proteasome activity, or molecular chaperones could reduce toxic protein aggregates in both HD and C9orf72 ALS.

3. Translating Progress Across Diseases

Research tools—such as assays for RNA foci, protein aggregation, and repeat instability—are shared across laboratories working on different repeat expansion disorders. Breakthroughs in one disease can therefore be rapidly tested in others.

Delivery challenges are also common: therapies must reach neurons in the brain and spinal cord. Advances in intrathecal ASO delivery or viral vector engineering benefit all disorders in this family.

In summary: Huntington’s disease and C9orf72 ALS/FTD are distinct conditions, but they share a unifying principle: DNA repeat expansions that disrupt RNA and protein homeostasis. Therapeutic strategies—including antisense oligonucleotides, RNA-targeting drugs, and gene-editing technologies—are broadly applicable across these diseases. Progress in one field accelerates progress in others, offering shared hope for patients facing these devastating neurodegenerative disorders.

There are often many causes to a non-communicable disease, particularly neurodegenerative diseases are more a consequence of a systemic failure than caused by a specific phenomenon. The multitude of papers assigning a specific mechanism, each time different, to neurodegenerative diseases is just noise that drags down knowledge acquisition in these domains. Some authors have hinted at a phase transition to explain the misfolding of some proteins, but what triggers this phase transition was elusive.

In this post, I discuss a very general paper. https://elifesciences.org/reviewed-preprints/107962v1

In simple terms, the authors have discovered how our innate immune system launches an extremely powerful and rapid response to a tiny signal from a pathogen. This has implications for age-related diseases such as cancer or neurodegenerative diseases.

The Core Problem:

Our immune system needs to react decisively to a single bacterium or virus. This involves a massive cellular response like inflammation or programmed cell death (pyroptosis, apoptosis). However, the initial detection of a pathogen (a single molecule binding to a receptor) provides almost no energy to power this massive response.

The Discovery - "Metastable Supersaturation": The authors found that key immune signaling proteins, specifically those containing Death Fold Domains (DFDs) (like ASC, FADD, BCL10, MAVS, TRADD), exist in a unique physical state inside our cells called metastable supersaturation. These full-length adaptors retain nucleation barriers and are able to exist supersaturated in cells. In contrast, many receptors and effectors do not. This localizes the “spring-loaded” behaviour to central adaptors that link receptor sensing to downstream cell-fate decisions.

A subset of death-fold domains (DFDs) are intrinsically “supersaturable.” Using a systematic screen of 109 human DFDs with a distributed amphifluoric FRET (DAmFRET) assay in yeast, the authors show that a minority of DFDs switch from soluble → assembled in a discontinuous (nucleation-limited) manner — the hallmark of a large intrinsic nucleation barrier. These discontinuous DFDs can therefore exist metastably above their saturation concentration (Csat) while remaining soluble (i.e. supersaturated).

Imagine a supersaturated solution of sugar water. It holds far more dissolved sugar than it should be able to. It remains liquid until you drop in a single sugar crystal, which instantly triggers the entire solution to crystallize.

Similarly, these DFD proteins are present in concentrations far higher than their natural solubility limit. They are kept in a soluble, "primed" state only by a high energy barrier that prevents them from spontaneously assembling (like the sugar needing a seed crystal).

This state acts as a long-term energy reservoir. The cell expends energy to produce and maintain these high levels of protein, storing potential energy for a future immune response. The authors show that tissues/cell types with shorter lifespans (e.g., monocytes) tend to express higher adaptor supersaturation than long-lived cells (neurons), suggesting a trade-off between rapid innate responsiveness and longevity. They also find conservation of nucleation barriers in distant taxa (fish, sponges, bacteria), indicating the mechanism is ancient.

How It Works for Immunity: When a pathogen is detected (the initial signal), the pathogen-bound receptor acts as the "seed crystal." This seed triggers the instantaneous, explosive polymerization of the supersaturated adaptor proteins (like ASC or FADD). This amplification process consumes the stored energy from supersaturation, converting it into a massive biochemical signal that leads to inflammation or cell death.

This allows for a response that is immediate, decisive, and independent of the cell's current metabolic energy (which is often hijacked by pathogens).

The Trade-Off is Immunity vs. Longevity:

This mechanism comes with a cost. Maintaining a supersaturated, "primed" state means there's always a risk of a spontaneous, accidental activation (a stochastic nucleation event). This would lead to unwanted inflammation or cell death without any infection. The authors found evidence that this trade-off is real: short-lived immune cells (like monocytes) have much higher levels of supersaturation than long-lived cells (like neurons). This suggests a fundamental thermodynamic drive where the need for strong immunity may inherently limit a cell's lifespan.

The authors also showed this system is highly specific (DFDs from one pathway don't accidentally trigger others) and that the mechanism is evolutionarily ancient, found in everything from humans to sponges to bacteria, indicating its fundamental importance.

This groundbreaking discovery opens up entirely new avenues for treating a wide range of diseases by targeting this "supersaturation engine."

1. Autoinflammatory and Autoimmune Diseases Examples: Crohn's disease, rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, CAPS (Cryopyrin-Associated Periodic Syndromes), type 1 diabetes.

2. Infectious Diseases Examples: Sepsis, severe viral infections (e.g., COVID-19, flu).

3. Cancer Application: Some cancers evade the immune system by preventing immune cells from initiating cell death (apoptosis) in cancerous cells. They might do this by interfering with the supersaturation or nucleation of proteins like FADD.

4. Neurodegenerative Diseases Examples: Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, ALS.

Therapeutic Strategy: This research provides a deeper biophysical understanding of how proteins form aggregates. Insights into controlling nucleation barriers could lead to strategies for preventing the initial "seed" event that sparks the catastrophic aggregation of proteins like amyloid-beta or alpha-synuclein.

Risks, trade-offs, and practical challenges

Immunity vs longevity trade-off. The authors argue a thermodynamic tradeoff: lowering supersaturation protects cells from spontaneous death but reduces rapid responsiveness to pathogens. Therapies that blunt supersaturation may increase infection susceptibility.

Off-target/cross-seeding risk. Although the interactome is relatively specific, some cross-nucleation exists (e.g., PYD↔DED). Inhibiting one adaptor could have unintended effects on other pathways, or conversely, seeding one adaptor therapeutically could accidentally trigger another.

Drugging interfaces is hard. Filamentizing interfaces and nucleation kinetics are complex to target with small molecules; biologics or degradation approaches may be more tractable but have delivery challenges.

Temporal and quantitative control required. Because the system is switch-like, small quantitative changes in concentration or barrier height can produce large outcome differences; therapies need tight control to avoid tipping the balance toward immunodeficiency or hyperinflammation.

In conclusion This study moves beyond simply listing the components of immune pathways to explaining the fundamental physics and energy dynamics that make them work. By understanding that immunity is powered by a "loaded spring" mechanism of metastable supersaturation, we can now think about designing much smarter, more precise drugs that either stabilize this spring (for autoimmune diseases) or trigger it on command (for cancer).

A recent study analyzed the plasma proteomes of over 2,000 participants to identify proteins and biological pathways associated with Alzheimer's disease and related disorders. https://www.nature.com/articles/s43587-025-00965-4

The widely held hypothesis among scientists is that sticky amyloid plaques in the brain are a hallmark of Alzheimer's disease. With the announcement that the initial work on this hypothesis was fraudulent, along with hundreds of unsuccessful clinical trials, a growing number of scientists suggest that other processes must be at play.

This new study suggests that factors outside the brain, such as processes in the blood and other organs, may contribute to the disease. The authors show that several biological processes, including those related to the extracellular matrix, proteostasis, the immune system, and metabolism, play an important role in Alzheimer's disease. This means that what happens in the rest of the body could influence the brain and how quickly Alzheimer's disease progresses. The study also highlights the strong influence of the APOE ε4 genotype and lipoprotein biology.

Extracellular matrix (ECM):

The ECM is closely linked to cerebral β-amyloid (Aβ) deposition and cognitive decline. Some ECM proteins, such as SMOC1 and SPON1, are elevated in both plasma and the brains of patients with Alzheimer’s, while others, like HTRA1, show opposite trends in the two compartments. Changes in the ECM could impact cognitive function independently of β-amyloid buildup and may be connected to vascular integrity loss.

ECM proteins are found throughout the body and provide structural and biochemical support to cells and tissues. They are produced by various cell types, with fibroblasts being the most common source in connective tissues. Other cells, such as cartilage chondrocytes and kidney mesangial cells, also produce ECM components.

Proteostasis:

This process, involving protein synthesis and clearance, is linked to both Aβ plaques and cognitive function. Increased protein synthesis correlates with better cognition, while enhanced protein degradation links to poorer cognitive performance. Further research is needed to understand how these processes interact in the brain and peripheral tissues.

The proteostasis network, which manages protein synthesis, folding, and degradation, operates across multiple cell compartments in all tissues. As a result, proteins involved in this process originate from organs like the liver, muscle, and adipose tissue.

Immune system:

Activation of the immune response in the blood is strongly associated with declines in cognitive function, even after accounting for Aβ plaques. This suggests that peripheral immune responses may contribute significantly to cognitive impairment.

Proteins involved in immune processes are primarily produced by immune cells like leukocytes (white blood cells) and by other cells in immune-related organs such as the bone marrow, spleen, and thymus.

Synaptic proteins:

The synaptic protein NPTXR was the only protein consistently associated with cognitive performance across all examined groups; higher NPTXR levels correlated with better cognition. However, the study found mixed associations for other neuronal proteins—some indicated healthy brain function, while others signaled neuronal damage.

Metabolism:

Unlike in the brain and cerebrospinal fluid, where increased metabolic proteins associate with cognitive decline, plasma proteins related to metabolism show the opposite trend. This inverse relationship suggests that these proteins may originate from peripheral non-neuronal sources or that their transport across the blood-brain barrier is tightly regulated.

Metabolic proteins participate in processes like glycolysis and energy production. They are produced by cells in tissues such as skeletal muscle, fat, and the liver, which is central to metabolic regulation.

Lipoproteins and APOE ε4:

Lipoprotein biology is closely linked to Aβ buildup in the brain and cognitive function. Lower plasma levels of lipoprotein proteins, including APOE, associate with higher brain Aβ levels. The study also confirms the widespread effects of the APOE ε4 genotype, influencing multiple pathways such as cell division and microtubule functions, potentially connecting Aβ and tau pathologies.

The liver mainly produces and regulates lipoproteins like VLDL and HDL, which are crucial for lipid transport in the bloodstream.

Conclusion:

The study showed that some biological pathways, including the extracellular matrix, are similar across blood, cerebrospinal fluid, and brain, but others, like metabolism and synaptic pathways, differ significantly. These findings emphasize the importance of studying proteins in multiple body compartments to fully understand their role in Alzheimer’s.

The researchers note several limitations, such as incomplete data on factors like medication use, the absence of long-term follow-up data, and limited information on neurofibrillary tangle (NFT) burden in most groups.

In summary, the study illustrates that the complex processes underlying Alzheimer's disease can be detected in blood plasma, identifying potential targets for future therapies and biomarkers. It also supports the idea of using blood tests as a less invasive, more accessible way to study and monitor the disease progression.

Most disease research involves inactivating or deleting biological entities like genes, proteins, or RNA. It's hard to imagine, in principle, how deleting an entity shaped by millions of years of evolution could benefit an organism. It's counterintuitive, yet sometimes it works due to a high level of redundancy in biological functions. What's more interesting, in my opinion, is research that aims to heal from disease by restoring health to a malfunctioning biological system.

Some scientists argue that neurodegenerative diseases are primarily age-related, so strategies to rejuvenate may help. Young plasma or bone marrow can rejuvenate aged animals, but these strategies have drawbacks.

A new study tested whether induced pluripotent stem cell–derived mononuclear phagocytes (iMPs) can offer similar regenerative effects in Alzheimer’s disease.

iPSCs are adult cells reprogrammed back into a stem-cell-like state. From iPSCs, researchers can generate various cell types, in this case, mononuclear phagocytes. It's a group that includes macrophages and microglia-like cells, which are key immune cells in both the body and the brain. The IMP treatment involves injecting these iPSC-derived phagocytes into middle-aged mice (11–12 months). They don’t cross the blood–brain barrier but instead release factors that influence the brain indirectly—for example, by modifying inflammation, supporting microglia, or affecting mossy cells.

What specific, observable results did the authors find? Regarding cognition and behavior, they observed that iMP-treated aging mice performed similarly to young mice in several tasks. In a test called "novel object location," iMPs fully reversed age-related deficits in some models. Most of us, as we age, would benefit from therapy in this area! The effects lasted up to 10 weeks of treatment. These findings were consistent across different mouse models, including immune-deficient NSG, wild-type BALB/c, and AD-prone 5xFAD. However, in Alzheimer’s model mice (5xFAD), iMPs improved memory tasks but did not reduce amyloid plaque load.

The authors found that some cell types benefited from the iMP therapy, but the effects weren’t due to overall neurogenesis. iMPs likely exert their effects via secreted factors. The authors also did not study how sex differences might influence the therapy’s effectiveness.

Overall, I find this article promising, but it has some shortcomings. Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) often retain an “epigenetic memory” of their tissue of origin. For example, skin-derived iPSCs might still carry subtle molecular traces that bias them toward skin-like fates. This raises questions about the mechanism of action; however, the reprogramming process may have reset many age-related cellular features.

As usual, more studies are needed, including investigations into gender differences. It’s clear that mice are not humans, so this article does not prove that this therapy might work in humans. Nonetheless, the principle behind this therapy appears promising, as it parallels the effects seen with young bone marrow transplants but does not require donor tissue. Additionally, iMPs can be generated autologously, reducing the risk of immune rejection.

A tool for ALS or FTD gene carriers.

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) are devastating neurodegenerative diseases. A significant number of cases are linked to a hexanucleotide repeat expansion in the C9orf72 gene, making it the most common known genetic cause of both conditions.

Genetic counseling is essential in informing families about their risk, especially for those with a family history of the disease. Currently, children of C9orf72 mutation carriers are often told they have a 50% chance of inheriting the mutation. While technically correct based on Mendelian inheritance, this figure overlooks a critical factor: age-related penetrance.

Penetrance describes the likelihood that someone carrying a disease-causing gene will develop the disease. In cases of C9orf72-related ALS/FTD, penetrance increases with age, peaking around 58 years old. This means that simply knowing you carry the mutation does not give the full picture of your personal risk.

A new study addresses this limitation by developing a more precise method for calculating risk and providing an online tool for families.

The tool is available here: https://lbbe-shiny.univ-lyon1.fr/ftd-als/

While other research has focused on identifying genetic modifiers of disease risk, this study centers on a readily available and easily measurable factor: age.

The researchers used a Bayesian approach, a statistical method that updates probabilities with new evidence. In this case, the evidence includes the individual's age and family history. By integrating age-related penetrance data, the researchers created a model to estimate the probability of carrying the C9orf72 mutation and developing ALS or FTD within a specific timeframe. This approach is especially relevant for asymptomatic relatives, such as children, siblings, grandchildren, and niblings of mutation carriers.

Importance of this work:

This research is significant because it moves beyond the simplified 50% risk figure, offering a more personalized and accurate risk assessment for individuals at risk of C9orf72-related ALS/FTD. It helps inform decisions about genetic testing and could influence lifestyle choices or participation in clinical trials. As testing for C9orf72 becomes more common, the need for nuanced interpretation of results increases. The findings are highly relevant for families affected by ALS/FTD, providing a more realistic understanding of their individual risk profiles.

Originality:

The study offers original insights beyond the basic concept. Although age-related penetrance is a known idea, this research presents a concrete, mathematically sound method to incorporate it into risk calculations. The online simulator further enhances its practical use. The novelty is in applying a Bayesian framework to refine risk estimates in C9orf72-related ALS/FTD, providing a more sophisticated and personalized approach than traditional Mendelian risk assessments.

Conclusion:

This study makes a valuable contribution to ALS/FTD genetics. By offering a more detailed and personalized risk assessment, it can improve genetic counseling, aid in clinical trial recruitment, and deepen the understanding of the disease. The online simulator makes this complex information accessible to clinicians and families, increasing its practical impact.

I often complain that neurodegenerative literature is of low quality and has little usefulness. Here is an article that may be very different.

It's known that in some diseases, like cord spine injury, some motor neurons reverse to an immature state, and it is thought that this may have a protective effect. The authors reflected that inducing vulnerable mature motor neurons into an immature state might be beneficial, and they tested this hypothesis in-vitro and on mice. Two key transcription factors, ISL1 and LHX3, are the master regulators of the immature motor neuron gene expression program. These factors are naturally expressed during embryonic development but are typically turned off in mature neurons. Yet ISL1 and LHX3 are not the only proteins involved in the maturation process of motor neurons. 7,000 genes change their expression significantly throughout postnatal motor neuron maturation

The developmental stages from a stem cell to a mature motor neuron follow these steps: The process begins with neural stem cells in the developing spinal cord. These cells can develop into various types of neurons and glial cells. Under the influence of signaling molecules (like Sonic Hedgehog), the neural progenitors become motor neuron progenitors, which are now committed to the motor neuron lineage. These progenitor cells multiply. Then these progenitors stop dividing and differentiate into neuroblasts. At this stage, neuroblasts express key transcription factors like ISL1 and LHX3, which establish the fundamental identity of the motor neuron. The neuroblast begins to resemble more to a motor neuron: They extend a long axon out of the spinal cord towards their target muscle. The cell also starts to acquire its specific electrical properties. Then the neuron reaches its target muscle, forms a neuromuscular junction, and becomes a fully functional, electrically active cell. At this point, the early master regulators like ISL1 and LHX3 are largely downregulated, and the neuron enters its final, mature state. The authors designed a genetic therapy with an AAV virus vector to make mature neurons express two proteins that are only expressed in the immature state. The AAVs were specifically engineered to target motor neurons. In the study conducted on mice, the administration mode of the AAV viral vector was able to specifically infect the spinal motor neurons. Once inside the mature motor neurons, the AAV released the therapeutic genes. This caused the neurons to begin expressing ISL1 and LHX3 again By re-expressing ISL1 and LHX3, the researchers essentially re-activate that original "immature" genetic program. This causes the mature neuron to revert to a state that is genetically and functionally similar to its younger self, with renewed resilience and stress-coping abilities. They believe that turning on the immature genetic program essentially re-awakens the neuron's dormant ability to regrow and repair itself. While mature neurons in the central nervous system have very limited regenerative capacity, the authors are suggesting that ISL1 and LHX3 could be flipping a switch that bypasses this limitation.

This was not achieved in a linear process; On the contrary, the study tells of multiple steps to study what was achieved and to learn how to progress.

Their study focussed on SOD1 ALS, so they used a SOD1 mouse model to study dysregulation of SQSTM1 and how ISL1 and LHX3 expression influence it. Large, round aggregates of SQSTM1 (termed “round bodies”) are detectable in the cytoplasm of SOD1 ALS motor neurons At transduction efficiencies greater than ∼80%, SQSTM1 round bodies were almost completely abrogated, pointing to a cell-autonomous effect of ISL1 and LHX3 re-expression on SQSTM1 pathology.

The transfected mice survived longer than the control ones, and the effect is much more pronounced in females than in males. Yet that was not a cure, and the study was only on SOD1 ALS; there are multiple types of ALS, so we don't have a clear idea of the impact of this therapy on other genetic/familial and sporadic ALS. Also, the authors found that the expression of ISL1 and LHX3 lasts only two weeks, so there is little time for the therapy to work. It would be interesting to see a similar study on the other species of nervous cells. The authors also highlight that it is unknown if this therapy would be effective late stages of the disease when motor neuron degeneration is underway and non-cell-autonomous factors such as neuroinflammation contribute to clinical progression.

The number of mice was also very low (8 mice in the treatment group and 6 mice in the control group), to the point where it is not statistically significant.

But for me, this study has a potential that most other studies have not: They try hard to heal motor neurons, not simply to repress some of the hundreds of genes involved in ALS. Gene KO approaches are lazy; it's shooting in the dark. This study is a great step forward, even if therapy is probably one or two decades away.

There has been a recent surge in articles about the Integrated Stress Response (ISR) in neurodegenerative diseases. The hypothesis suggests that the ISR, a cellular mechanism for managing stress, becomes excessively prolonged in these conditions. Several refinements of this idea have been proposed, such as the notion that protein misfolding occurs because the endoplasmic reticulum cannot properly process proteins during ISR, leading to the accumulation of misfolded proteins in the cytoplasm, which causes various problems. For example, TDP-43 proteins fail to fold correctly and cannot be transported to the nucleus, where they play critical roles in DNA repair and virus defense.

In this blog, we have discussed this topic multiple times, including the Inflectis Sephin1/IFB-088 drug.

One such article about ISR is ALSUntangled #80, which discusses a drug called ISRIB (Integrated Stress Response Inhibitor).

Several ISR inhibitors have been identified, including Guanabenz, IFB-088, Salubrinal, and ISRIB. Some of these drugs, like Guanabenz, have significant side effects, making them less suitable for long-term and widespread use.

The outcomes of ALSUntangled are usually predictable; they tend to indicate that any drug they evaluate has limited interest for ALS. However, this time, it feels different, possibly because the two main authors, Javier Mascias Cadavid and Anna Mena Bravo, are from Spain.

They discuss ISRIB and how it was informally tested by 42 ALS patients in Spain, who reported subjective improvements and no side effects.

There are additional publications exploring whether ISRIB could be a promising treatment for ALS.

They say that ISR might be the culprit in a rare subtype of ALS, which is caused by a mutation in VAPB gene. The authors suggest that ISRIB might be useful. What should we consider about all this? Maybe we should ask why scientists are searching for new drugs instead of focusing on compounds of drugs that have already shown some effects. Perhaps everyone wants to get rich, so they avoid exploring drugs that can't be patented.

For example, nobody has research on the benefits of Meclofenoxate in ALS in the last 50 years! A recent publication suggests it might be useful in Parkinson's disease.