I often complain that neurodegenerative literature is of low quality and has little usefulness. Here is an article that may be very different.

It's known that in some diseases, like cord spine injury, some motor neurons reverse to an immature state, and it is thought that this may have a protective effect. The authors reflected that inducing vulnerable mature motor neurons into an immature state might be beneficial, and they tested this hypothesis in-vitro and on mice. Two key transcription factors, ISL1 and LHX3, are the master regulators of the immature motor neuron gene expression program. These factors are naturally expressed during embryonic development but are typically turned off in mature neurons. Yet ISL1 and LHX3 are not the only proteins involved in the maturation process of motor neurons. 7,000 genes change their expression significantly throughout postnatal motor neuron maturation

The developmental stages from a stem cell to a mature motor neuron follow these steps: The process begins with neural stem cells in the developing spinal cord. These cells can develop into various types of neurons and glial cells. Under the influence of signaling molecules (like Sonic Hedgehog), the neural progenitors become motor neuron progenitors, which are now committed to the motor neuron lineage. These progenitor cells multiply. Then these progenitors stop dividing and differentiate into neuroblasts. At this stage, neuroblasts express key transcription factors like ISL1 and LHX3, which establish the fundamental identity of the motor neuron. The neuroblast begins to resemble more to a motor neuron: They extend a long axon out of the spinal cord towards their target muscle. The cell also starts to acquire its specific electrical properties. Then the neuron reaches its target muscle, forms a neuromuscular junction, and becomes a fully functional, electrically active cell. At this point, the early master regulators like ISL1 and LHX3 are largely downregulated, and the neuron enters its final, mature state. The authors designed a genetic therapy with an AAV virus vector to make mature neurons express two proteins that are only expressed in the immature state. The AAVs were specifically engineered to target motor neurons. In the study conducted on mice, the administration mode of the AAV viral vector was able to specifically infect the spinal motor neurons. Once inside the mature motor neurons, the AAV released the therapeutic genes. This caused the neurons to begin expressing ISL1 and LHX3 again By re-expressing ISL1 and LHX3, the researchers essentially re-activate that original "immature" genetic program. This causes the mature neuron to revert to a state that is genetically and functionally similar to its younger self, with renewed resilience and stress-coping abilities. They believe that turning on the immature genetic program essentially re-awakens the neuron's dormant ability to regrow and repair itself. While mature neurons in the central nervous system have very limited regenerative capacity, the authors are suggesting that ISL1 and LHX3 could be flipping a switch that bypasses this limitation.

This was not achieved in a linear process; On the contrary, the study tells of multiple steps to study what was achieved and to learn how to progress.

Their study focussed on SOD1 ALS, so they used a SOD1 mouse model to study dysregulation of SQSTM1 and how ISL1 and LHX3 expression influence it. Large, round aggregates of SQSTM1 (termed “round bodies”) are detectable in the cytoplasm of SOD1 ALS motor neurons At transduction efficiencies greater than ∼80%, SQSTM1 round bodies were almost completely abrogated, pointing to a cell-autonomous effect of ISL1 and LHX3 re-expression on SQSTM1 pathology.

The transfected mice survived longer than the control ones, and the effect is much more pronounced in females than in males. Yet that was not a cure, and the study was only on SOD1 ALS; there are multiple types of ALS, so we don't have a clear idea of the impact of this therapy on other genetic/familial and sporadic ALS. Also, the authors found that the expression of ISL1 and LHX3 lasts only two weeks, so there is little time for the therapy to work. It would be interesting to see a similar study on the other species of nervous cells. The authors also highlight that it is unknown if this therapy would be effective late stages of the disease when motor neuron degeneration is underway and non-cell-autonomous factors such as neuroinflammation contribute to clinical progression.

The number of mice was also very low (8 mice in the treatment group and 6 mice in the control group), to the point where it is not statistically significant.

But for me, this study has a potential that most other studies have not: They try hard to heal motor neurons, not simply to repress some of the hundreds of genes involved in ALS. Gene KO approaches are lazy; it's shooting in the dark. This study is a great step forward, even if therapy is probably one or two decades away.

Les scientifiques n'ont pas une idée très claire sur la genèse (le prodrome) de plusieurs maladies neurodégénératives. Par exemple il y a un débat récurrent sur l'origine anatomique de la SLA, commence-t-elle à la jonction neuro-musculaire ou dans le cerveau. Ce débat naît du fait que souvent les symptômes de la SLA apparaissent à l'extrémité d'un membre et il semble naturel de penser que le maladie naît là et s'étend dans le reste du corps.

Cependant cela n'est pas l'opinion majoritaire qui suit celle du docteur Charcot formée il y a plus de 100 ans, que la SLA naît dans le cerveau. Chaque camp revendique avoir apporté des preuves ou au moins des éléments très convaincants de sa thèse, mais pour un observateur un peu sceptique aucun camp n'est réellement convaincant.

Une nouvelle étude affirme apporter la preuve que la SLA naît dans le cerveau.

En fait c’est la vieille (~40 ans) hypothèse de l’exitotoxicité qui resurgit une nouvelle fois.

Celle-ci suggère qu’une hyperactivité persistante des neurones moteurs supérieures est la cause de leur dégénération. Le glutamate est souvent impliqué par les scientifiques comme cause d’excitotoxicité, mais un médecin présentera le même phénomène de façon plus concrête :

• Après un accident vasculaire cérébral (AVC) affectant le cortex moteur ou le faisceau corticospinal, certains neurones moteurs peuvent devenir hyperexcitables. Cela contribue à la spasticité et au clonus en phase chronique.
• L'hyperthyroïdie peut augmenter l'excitabilité neuronale, affectant parfois le cortex moteur.

• Certains médicaments ou toxines (par exemple, certains stimulants, les organophosphorés notamment utilisés dans l’agriculture, certaines plantes, l’alcool) peuvent abaisser les seuils d'activation neuronale.

• La privation de sommeil sur une longue durée a aussi cet effet.

Dans le cerveau, les neurones moteurs supérieures envoient de longs axones jusqu'à la moelle épinière, où ils se connectent (directement ou indirectement) aux motoneurones inférieurs (neurones moteurs supérieuresI), qui contrôlent à leur tour les muscles. En conditions normales, les neurones moteurs supérieures équilibrent excitation et inhibition pour produire des mouvements fluides et précis.

Lorsque les neurones moteurs supérieures deviennent hyperexcitables, cet équilibre est rompu. Ils déclenchent trop fréquemment leurs signaux en réponse à des entrées normales, car leur seuil d'activation est anormalement bas. Ils peuvent alors générer des pics d'activité qui sur-stimulent les neurones connectés.

Les travaux des auteurs étayent l'idée que (chez la souris de laboratoire) l'hyperexcitabilité corticale n'est pas seulement une conséquence de la SLA, mais peut être un facteur principal de l'apparition et de la progression de la maladie. En effet les auteurs ont testé directement la causalité, et non la corrélation de ces évènements.

Les chercheurs ont utilisé une approche chimio-génétique DREADD pour rendre artificiellement les motoneurones supérieurs du cortex moteur, hyperexcitables pendant des mois chez des souris adultes par ailleurs en bonne santé. Cependant la méthode utilisée est peu sélective du type de cellule (infection par AAV). Non seulement les souris ont présenté des signes comparables à ceux de la SLA chez les humains, mais au niveau moléculaire il y a aussi des éléments convergents comme la formation d’aggrégats de protéine TDP-43 dans le cytoplasme.

Il y a toutefois des éléments étonnants dans cette étude, par exemple le temps de chute ne semble pas avoir beaucoup varié entre le mesure effectuée au début et celle effectué à la fin de l'étude. Et on peut s'interroger pourquoi le groupe des souris traitées n'a pas la même performance en matière de chute que les autres groupes au début de l'étude. De façon similaire, la force des souris modifiés génétiquement est nettement plus basse au début du traitement qu’à la fin, c’est l’inverse de ce qu’on pourrait attendre d’une souris qui serait de plus en plus affaiblie. Et pourquoi ce groupe de souris aurait-il une force plus faible au début de l’expérience ? S’il n’y a pas de sélection à priori, les différents groupes de souris (traités et non traités) devraient avoir la même force.

Pour les auteurs l'hyperexcitabilité seule est suffisante pour produire des symptômes similaires à ceux de la SLA. C’est possible mais cela n’explique pas pourquoi la SLA apparaît en un endroit particulier de l’anatomie, ni n’explique les SLA causées par des anomalies génétiques. Par ailleurs on sait qu’un stress cellulaire persistant peut déclencher une SLA (ou d’autres maladies suivant les tissus atteints) quand la réponse cellulaire (ISR) est inadaptée.

Que conclure ? Les auteurs semblent être des stakhanovistes de la publication scientifique et avoir accès à des fonds conséquents. La plupart d'entre eux ont signé plusieurs articles par mois, quasiment tous les mois depuis des années. Cela semble carrément impossible dans le cadre d’une pratique professionnelle de qualité.

There has been a recent surge in articles about the Integrated Stress Response (ISR) in neurodegenerative diseases. The hypothesis suggests that the ISR, a cellular mechanism for managing stress, becomes excessively prolonged in these conditions. Several refinements of this idea have been proposed, such as the notion that protein misfolding occurs because the endoplasmic reticulum cannot properly process proteins during ISR, leading to the accumulation of misfolded proteins in the cytoplasm, which causes various problems. For example, TDP-43 proteins fail to fold correctly and cannot be transported to the nucleus, where they play critical roles in DNA repair and virus defense.

In this blog, we have discussed this topic multiple times, including the Inflectis Sephin1/IFB-088 drug.

One such article about ISR is ALSUntangled #80, which discusses a drug called ISRIB (Integrated Stress Response Inhibitor).

Several ISR inhibitors have been identified, including Guanabenz, IFB-088, Salubrinal, and ISRIB. Some of these drugs, like Guanabenz, have significant side effects, making them less suitable for long-term and widespread use.

The outcomes of ALSUntangled are usually predictable; they tend to indicate that any drug they evaluate has limited interest for ALS. However, this time, it feels different, possibly because the two main authors, Javier Mascias Cadavid and Anna Mena Bravo, are from Spain.

They discuss ISRIB and how it was informally tested by 42 ALS patients in Spain, who reported subjective improvements and no side effects.

There are additional publications exploring whether ISRIB could be a promising treatment for ALS.

They say that ISR might be the culprit in a rare subtype of ALS, which is caused by a mutation in VAPB gene. The authors suggest that ISRIB might be useful. What should we consider about all this? Maybe we should ask why scientists are searching for new drugs instead of focusing on compounds of drugs that have already shown some effects. Perhaps everyone wants to get rich, so they avoid exploring drugs that can't be patented.

For example, nobody has research on the benefits of Meclofenoxate in ALS in the last 50 years! A recent publication suggests it might be useful in Parkinson's disease.

Les oligonucléotides antisens (ASO) sont de petites séquences d'ADN capables de réduire l'expression d'un gène cible au niveau post-transcriptionnel, ce qui les rend intéressants pour neutraliser les produits génétiques mutants ou toxiques. Les progrès réalisés dans la chimie médicinale des ASO ont amélioré leur profil pharmacodynamique, permettant ainsi une administration sûre et efficace au système nerveux central. Les thérapies ASO pour la SLA se sont rapidement développées au cours des deux dernières décennies, et les ASO ciblant SOD1, C9orf72 et ATXN2 sont actuellement en essais cliniques pour les formes familiales ou sporadiques de SLA.

L'injection directe dans le SNC permet à l'ASO de se distribuer dans tout le SNC, et les ASO ciblant SOD1 (Tofersen/Qalsody) ont démontré que l'administration intrathécale était une approche bien tolérée. De nouvelles approches d'administration, telles que la conjugaison des ASO à des nanoparticules lipidiques ou à des cholestérols, pourraient bientôt permettre une administration moins intrusive et pouvant être effectuée par davantage de professionels.

Les mutations du sarcome fusionné (FUS) sont à l'origine d'une forme rare et agressive de SLA, d'apparition précoce et souvent juvénile. FUS est une protéine de liaison à l'ARN essentielle à la réparation et au métabolisme de l'ADN, notamment à l'épissage et à la traduction de l'ARNm.

Alors que la plupart des formes de SLA présentent généralement une pathologie TDP-43, les tissus post-mortem de patients atteints de SLA présentent une agrégation intracytoplasmique en l'absence de pathologie TDP-43. Identifié par criblage in vitro, l'ASO ION363 développé par la société IONIS qui a aussi développé Tofersen, cible le 6e intron de FUS (SLA avec une mutation P525L). ION363 réduit les taux de protéines de liaison à l'ARN insolubles et insolubles associées aux agrégats, telles que hnRNPA1 et ralentit la neurodégénérescence des motoneurones lombaires et la perte d'innervation de la jonction neuromusculaire.

L'inversion de la neurodégénérescence et la réduction de la prolifération chez les souris P525L ont motivé une demande d'IND (« usage compassionnel ») pour des tests chez l'homme porteur de mutations. Une demande d’IND a été approuvée par la FDA pour l’utilisation d’ION363 chez un patient atteint de SLA porteur d’une mutation P525L (âgé de 26 ans).

Jaci Hermstad, une jeune femme de 25 ans originaire de l'Iowa, a reçu un diagnostic de SLA-FUS, huit ans après avoir perdu sa sœur jumelle, atteinte de la même maladie, à l'âge de 17 ans. La famille Hermstad a contacté Project ALS et le Dr Shneider, qui étudiait le potentiel des ASO dans le traitement des patients atteints de SLA-FUS, pour savoir s'il existait des thérapies susceptibles d'aider Jaci.

« L'histoire des Hermstad a immédiatement attiré l'attention de nombreuses personnes talentueuses et bienveillantes, d'Ionis et du Dr Shneider, expert du gène FUS, aux experts réglementaires bénévoles, aux fabricants et aux conseillers universitaires », a déclaré Valerie Estess, directrice de recherche du Project ALS. Le courage de Jaci, et le travail d'équipe qu'elle a inspiré, peuvent désormais porter leurs fruits pour tous les patients atteints de SLA-FUS.

Grâce au financement de l'ALS Association et du Projet SLA, le Dr Shneider et son équipe de Columbia ont pu proposer le jacifusen à dix patients supplémentaires atteints de SLA-FUS au cours des deux dernières années, tout en suivant en parallèle les données de sécurité du médicament et les biomarqueurs pertinents pour la maladie.

Cela a conduit la Chambre des représentants des États-Unis à adopter le projet de loi de Jaci, autorisant les médecins à administrer l'ASO avant de réaliser des tests toxicologiques sur des rongeurs. Selon sa nécrologie, Hermstad a reçu 12 injections du médicament, appelé Jacifusen, entre juin 2019 et mars 2020 avant de décéder de la SLA le 1er mai 2020.

À l'autopsie, l'ION363 a été largement détecté dans les tissus du cerveau et de la moelle épinière, deux mois après la dernière perfusion. Les signes pathologiques de la SLA-FUS P525L ont diminué, notamment les inclusions cytoplasmiques neuronales positives, les agrégats insolubles de protéines de liaison à l'ARN et d'autres protéines, ainsi que la localisation nucléaire.

Un examen neuropathologique a été réalisé chez le premier participant, ainsi que chez un témoin non atteint de SLA et un patient atteint de SLA porteur de la mutation P525L n'ayant pas reçu de traitement. Par rapport au témoin atteint de SLA, le participant traité par ASO présentait moins de protéines totales et mutantes, y compris de protéines insolubles, dans la moelle épinière lombaire.

Shneider et son équipe à Columbia ont proposé du Jacifusen à dix patients supplémentaires atteints de SLA au cours des deux dernières années.

En juin 2021, Ionis a lancé un essai de phase 3 appelé ION, visant à traiter jusqu'à 77 patients dans le monde. Les participants sont âgés de 11 ans et plus, atteints de SLA causée par une mutation pathogène confirmée du gène ION363 et ne doivent pas être sous ventilation mécanique permanente au moment de l'inscription. Ils reçoivent des injections rachidiennes d'ION363 ou d'un placebo toutes les douze semaines, après une dose de charge à quatre semaines, pendant 61 semaines, suivies d'une prolongation en ouvert de 85 semaines. Le critère d'évaluation principal est l'évolution fonctionnelle selon l'échelle d'évaluation fonctionnelle de la SLA révisée et la durée de vie sans ventilation mécanique. Les critères d'évaluation secondaires incluent la qualité de vie, la fonction pulmonaire et musculaire, la survie et les modifications du biomarqueur des chaînes légères des neurofilaments. Réalisé à L'essai clinique, mené sur 24 sites en Amérique du Nord, en Europe, au Royaume-Uni, à Taïwan et en Corée, devrait se poursuivre jusqu'en juin 2026.

La deuxième partie de l'étude consiste en une période d'extension ouverte de 72 semaines au cours de laquelle tous les participants ont reçu du jacifusen.

Une caractéristique unique de cet essai est la mise en œuvre d'un « sauvetage ». Plus précisément, si un participant présente un déclin fonctionnel significatif au cours de la première partie, il sera transféré vers la deuxième partie/extension ouverte de l'étude. Cela semble suspect du point de vue statistique: L'étude ne conserve que les patients qui évoluent lentement!

Bien que la plupart des participants aient connu un déclin fonctionnel continu (mesuré par l’ALSFRS-R) après le début du traitement par jacifusen, l’un d’eux a présenté une récupération fonctionnelle objective sans précédent après 10 mois, et un autre est resté asymptomatique, avec une amélioration documentée des anomalies électromyographiques.

At Padiracinnovation, we face a paradox: despite the deluge of scientific publications on ALS, Parkinson's, and Alzheimer's disease, academic and industry scientists seem unable to develop effective drugs.

In fact, the incentive for academic scientists appears to be publishing a large volume of work, as this is nearly their only path to career advancement. Industry scientists publish infrequently, but their work primarily serves to promote their company to potential investors.

How can we differentiate the wheat from the chaff? There are several telltale signs:

• single author

• authors who publish more than two papers per year

• publishing outside of prominent journals, such as in conferences

• articles based on specific intuition without testing other hypotheses

• articles concerning a specific drug without explaining the rationale for its initial selection

• articles making bold claims based on queries to a public database without conducting further research to validate the results and without considering confounding factors

• articles making outrageous claims, such as "breakthrough in disease X."

In our field, additional indicators exist: a strong publication should report results from human trials, as animal models often prove to be completely ineffective.

Consequently, we find few publications to discuss, even as popular science news organisations report daily on significant advances made toward new drugs.

Two FDA-approved small-molecule drugs, riluzole and edaravone, are currently available on the market; the antisense oligonucleotide tofersen was also recently approved. However, none blocks disease progression, making it crucial to investigate new therapeutic routes to overcome ALS.

Several products are known to slightly slow ALS progression, but they are not pursued by the pharmaceutical industry and academics because they lack patentability. One of the best-known among these products is TUDCA, while two lesser-known ones are Acetyl-L-Carnitine and Alpha-Lipoic Acid.

There are many forms of ALS, and each will likely require different therapeutics. Most forms are characterized by aggregates of misfolded TDP-43 fragments, an important protein. Various theories exist regarding how these aggregates form; one posits that they are a form of stress granules.

Numerous teams from diverse backgrounds collaborated to find a drug capable of dissolving these aggregates.

They screened many drug candidates and found that one, closely related to Alpha-Lipoic Acid, holds good prospects for future use as a drug. Indeed, it will likely be modified to enhance its bioavailability and thus could be patented.

The scientists screened a library of 1,600 small molecules to identify compounds that affect stress granule formation, using HeLa cells expressing FUS–GFP, a fusion protein that localizes to stress granules under stress. I remain cautious about findings from in vitro experiments, especially those involving immortalized cells of cervical cancer, whose biology often differs from that of normal cells. So consider yourselves warned, dear readers. The researchers specifically focused on molecules that could reduce or reverse stress granule formation, particularly those that act directly on stress granule proteins and may be useful as therapeutic agents. From the initial screening, lipoamide emerged as a novel, potent modulator of stress granules. Once lipoamide was identified as a hit, the researchers sought to determine its effects in cells regarding specificity, potency, intracellular localization, and its effects on other cellular condensates.

It's beneficial to understand the underlying mechanism of action, even if it's often challenging to achieve in biology. Thus, the authors evaluated the structure–activity relationships (SAR). Understanding which chemical features are critical for its function will assist in enhancing the potency of a future drug. The authors thus aimed to clarify its mechanism of action—whether it alters the physical properties of condensates, binds to specific proteins, or acts via redox chemistry.

Lipoamide was found to prevent stress granule formation when added before stress and to dissolve existing stress granules when added afterward.

Lipoamide's effect was also specific to stress granules, without impacting other cellular condensates or general protein synthesis. This specificity is crucial as it minimizes the risk of adverse effects.

Proteins stabilized by lipoamide are enriched in intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) with high arginine and tyrosine content—characteristics typical of stress granule proteins. These effects suggest that lipoamide interacts with these IDR-rich proteins to modulate condensate behavior, likely through nonenzymatic redox interactions.

In conclusion, the authors identified lipoamide as a promising small molecule that selectively and reversibly modulates stress granule formation. It does so not through conventional binding to a specific target, but likely via redox-sensitive interactions with disordered proteins, altering the physical properties of condensates.

This may have therapeutic implications for ALS and other neurodegenerative diseases linked to stress granule dysfunction. However, this research is not yet at the pre-clinical trial stage, which we know unfortunately provides limited information about success in human trials. This study is in vitro with cells that possess biology mostly alien to living beings. These cells are not motor neurons, so it's somewhat odd to see so many references to ALS in the text; it's probably a bait for investors.

An unusual news today: Alchemab Therapeutics, a UK biopharmaceutical company, announced it has entered a collaboration with Lilly to discover novel therapeutic candidates to treat amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). There are a few similar announcements, so it means that Lilly knows that Alchemab's drug has a good chance of developing into a commercial drug. A similar partnership in the ALS field was Ionis with Biogen, which at the end provided Tofersen (Qalsody), which helped some ALS patients.

Alchemab's approach is data-oriented. Instead of trying to find molecules that are causative of a disease and to deactivate them, they search individuals with unusually slow rates of disease progression, or at risk of developing a disease but still healthy, to identify antibodies associated with resilience. Such individuals could be patients with years of survival with typically untreatable cancer, very long-lived, healthy individuals without chronic diseases, or patients with susceptibility to neurodegenerative disease that do not progress (it happens). If you want to know more about their methods, here is a link: https://www.mlsb.io/papers_2023/Enhancing_Antibody_Language_Models_with_Structural_Information.pdf

Alchemab believes these antibodies, which are not found in disease progressors, could present therapeutic opportunities. This is complicated reasoning. Why would antibodies be useful in non-transmissible diseases in general? Why not an approach like those of Ionis, which uses ASO to prevent proteins from being produced by the cell in the first place? And this is too simplistic to my taste, but apparently Lilly thinks otherwise. Alchemab deliberately uses agnostic approaches because it is not tainted by bias or misunderstanding of underlying biology.

Once data-driven approaches find an antibody candidate, it must be modified to be stable and safe for the host. Then it must be tested in pre-clinical studies on animal models, and if successful, in clinical trials involving humans.

Alchemab already has several candidate drugs in its pipeline, and there is one for ALS. The drug is named ATLX-1282, and it targets the protein UNC5C. This protein belongs to the UNC-5 family of netrin receptors. The UNC-5 family of receptors mediate the repellent response to netrin. Netrins are secreted proteins that direct axon extension and cell migration during neural development. They are bifunctional proteins that act as attractants for some cell types and as repellents for others, and these opposite actions are thought to be mediated by two classes of receptors.

So, at least there is some logical connection between the drug and the disease; this is not the case for most drugs (unsuccessfully) tested against ALS. Yet there are thousands of molecules associated with ALS, and it is not disclosed what makes UNC5C a good target in ALS. In addition, netrins apparently act during neural development, yet most ALS patients are at the opposite end of the life span.

Here are some publications on the relation between axon guidance and ALS, but it's not because some scientific publications assert something that it is necessarily true or useful.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24918638/

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25177267/

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2175528/

The only publication I found by Alchemab about ALS and UNC5C is this one: https://www.alchemab.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Society-for-Neuroscience-Posters.pdf I am not sure it proves anything about a link between ALS and UNC5C or even netrins.

Since we still don't know the causes of ALS and several other sporadic neurodegenerative diseases, it's interesting to find potential biomarkers associated with these diseases. Furthermore, since most clinical trials are negative, the pharmaceutical industry is seeking to change the definition of a successful trial by substituting biomarkers for clinical signs, as they are said to be more reliable. While there is some truth in this approach, it still seems highly questionable from an ethical perspective: The sole purpose is to validate clinical trials, even if there is no improvement in patient symptoms.

Researchers are therefore currently working to find biomarkers for neurodegenerative diseases, as the market for these tools appears immense and lucrative. The ideal biomarker would be an inexpensive blood test.

Researchers from Thomas Jefferson University examined two American GEO databases that collect blood samples (plasma and serum). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/info/overview.html

The Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) is a public repository that archives and freely distributes comprehensive microarray, next-generation sequencing, and other forms of high-throughput functional genomics data submitted by the scientific community. These are digital data provided by microbiology tools and are therefore presumed to be reliable, but the associated metadata (provided by humans) may not be of high quality. Furthermore, some datasets submitted to GEO may have been contaminated.

Scientists focused on the small RNA fragments present in these samples. They focused on small non-coding RNAs because these molecules are stable and abundant in blood fluids such as plasma and serum.

These molecules were classified as follows:

• isomiR: slightly altered versions of microRNAs

• tRF: fragments from transfer RNA

• rRF: fragments of ribosomal RNA

• yRF: fragments of another type of RNA, Y RNAs

• And a residual group, called "not-itrs," for sequences they initially could not categorize.

The scientists found that these small types of RNA do not appear in sufficient quantities in ALS patients as in healthy people.

Some of these differences were related to the patients' survival time, even after taking into account factors such as age, sex, and whether or not they were taking riluzole (a common treatment for ALS).

Interestingly, some "non-itrs" sequences did not match human DNA, but rather the ribosomal DNA of bacteria (Burkholderiales) or fungi. Some of these foreign sequences were also linked to patient survival. This is a worrying claim.

What should we make of these claims of non-human RNA discovery in patients? Initial contamination is a plausible explanation for the detection of small non-human RNAs (sncRNAs), and it is a known concern in studies of low-input samples such as plasma and serum. But this contamination would also be apparent in samples from people without ALS.

The tools used in microbiology use short reads that are algorithmically reassembled. These short reads are likely to match multiple genomes by chance, increasing the risk of false positives during alignment, particularly if the databases are large and noisy. Here too, contamination would be apparent in samples from people without ALS.

Another explanation is that the presence of non-human genomes in humans is completely normal: our skin, mucous membranes, and internal organs harbor an extensive variety of microorganisms. We don't live in a vacuum. What we do know is that these populations of microorganisms respond to the host's health, sometimes with significant variations. For example, it has been shown that in Alzheimer's disease and, more generally, in aging, the dental microbial population is very different from that of healthy people.

So what can we conclude? There's probably no reason to worry; ALS is probably not caused by specific microbes or microscopic fungi. But that doesn't change the fact that we know that certain cyanobacteria cause a disease similar to ALS.